Ontario’s Persistent Net Contribution to the Federation
Ontarians have consistently contributed more to the federal government in total tax revenue than they have received in federal spending in return. Using newly-updated StatsCan data, this report undertakes a quantitative analysis of the elements of the federal government’s revenue raising and spending practices to identify which of those elements lead to net contributions or benefits to the federation, with a particular focus on Ontario.
Through the course of this analysis, this report finds that Ontario receives disproportionately lower shares of important areas of federal spending than do other provinces. Furthermore, Ontario is unique among provinces in that it has a fiscal capacity lower than the national average, but continues to contribute more to the federal government in revenue than it receives in spending.
In 2014-15, the federal government spent over $250 billion on various programs including transfers to people, transfers to other governments and direct spending. Canadians expect governments to account for how their tax dollars are used. Is money spent wisely? Does the spending achieve its intended goals? Has federal spending been allocated fairly across the country?
The analysis in this paper will contextualize that last question by attempting to measure the gap between the amount of federal taxes paid by the residents of each province, and what they receive in return, in the form of federal spending. This is not a new field of research – this report is an extension of the Mowat Centre’s fiscal gap papers from 2013 and 2014 which analyzed a snapshot of the 2009-10 fiscal landscape. The suspension of a key dataset required for this analysis meant that further work was not possible beyond 2009, the final year for which data was available.
The release of the Government Finance Statistics data set by Statistics Canada this summer allows for the extension of this analysis to 2014, albeit on a somewhat different accounting basis. Our analysis reveals that, despite economic and fiscal changes, the list of net contributors and beneficiaries is largely unchanged since 2009.
This report is not an attempt to assess the value of the federation. A certain degree of inter-regional redistribution is an expected and often desirable feature of any federation. Rather, this report will undertake a quantitative analysis of the elements of the federal government’s revenue-raising and spending practices to identify which of those elements lead to net contributions or benefits to the federation, with a particular focus on Ontario.
Specifically, this report finds that Ontario continues to receive disproportionately lower shares of important areas of federal spending. Furthermore, despite having a fiscal capacity lower than the national average, Ontario continues to contribute more to the federal government in revenue than it receives in spending, just as it did in 2009.View PDF
January 4, 2017
More related to this topic
- Health care is about sharing risk. Federalism in Canada should be too.
- Mind the Gap
- When it comes to health care, the federal and provincial governments are arguing over growth rates. Here’s why that’s the wrong conversation.
- The federal government is retreating from health care. Here’s why that’s a terrible idea.